Steven Chu | The One Minute Interview

As Obama's new Energy Secretary, Steven Chu is probably the single most important figure in world environmental politics right now. Paul Quinn snags a 60-second interview for RSA Arts & Ecology at the Nobel Laureate Symposium to get a glimpse of the challenges he's facing — and finds a man who's singularly upbeat about the tasks ahead. 

Steven ChuWhen rumours started flying at the end of last year that Dr. Steven Chu was in the running to be President Obama's new Energy Secretery, green movements worldwide were lit up by the idea that Ombama's promises on climate might actually add up to something. Chu has a reputation not only a brilliant scientist, but as someone who is energised by the gravity of the challenge that climate change presents. 

His appointment, says Margie Alt, executive director of Environment America, "represents a 180-degree turnaround for the United States on the environment and energy policy."

He's a brilliant University of California academic, but can someone with as frank as Steven Chu — who was happy to declare as recently as 2007 that "coal is my worst nightmare" — survive the minefield of energy lobby interestes that is Washington? Five months into the job, with the American Clean Energy and Security Act starting to make its painfully slow progress to the House of Represenatives and then to the Senate, many enivornmentalists fear that too many compromises have already been made, and that the cap-and-trade approach at its heart is more about delay than action. Chu, however, stands by the Act as "our best shot".

Dr Chu is a Nobel Prizewinner for his work as a physicist, working on trapping atoms with laser light. Paul Quinn caught up with Chu briefly at the  Nobel Laureate Symposium on climate change's Gala Cultural Evening at London's Science Museum, to find him upbeat about his task, convinced he was going to emerge from his time at the Department of Energy "with integrity".


 
I like your Titanic analogy [see Steven Chu's YouTube video below made before his appointment by Obama, comparing our situation to the Titanic sequel] — we’re heading for an iceberg, but vested interests are keen to ignore it and plough on, believing we’re unsinkable...

[Laughs] I like it too, but my team says don’t use it. It’s strange, all the Whitehouse press people say, "Oh no, don’t talk about that, that’s bad news".

People do pick holes in the analogy too…

I know, I know. And there’s more. The Titanic’s sister ship went down a few years later and there’s concern that the steel and the bolts in both ships had an issue that in cold weather they became very brittle. But anyway, the issue is not the details of "glancing blows" or
anything… But I’m going to have to look for a better analogy. I still have these discussions with the messaging people at the White House, about what I think works and what they think works.”

Does it feel odd, having been part of the scientific lobby trying
to convince government on climate change, now suddenly being on the
"other side"?


Well, I’m still on the scientific lobby side, I’m just on the inside now. You have to try your best to work on the inside to get the desired effect you wanted on the outside.

But in the end, when I leave this job, I have to leave with my integrity — and the good news is, I will be able to do that.

http://www.nobelcause.org/



Steve Chu
describing what climate change means to him shortly before his appointment as US Energy Secretary:


Paul Quinn is a journalist and web editor for WWF UK. He says of his meeting with Chu: "He did seem remarkably relaxed for a man with the expectations of the world on his shoulders - he wears it well. He turned out to be one of the easiest people to talk to, in the end, so I certainly wish we'd had longer.

"I did get the impression that the last quote, where he said 'The good news is I'll keep my integrity', sounded like something he's probably rehearsed — on one hand it sounds very positive, like he'll achieve things his way, without compromise, but it could also be a good get-out clause if he realises he's not going to get his way and he wants out... Let's hope it's the former!

"The thing that struck me most was the high regard he's held in by his peers (and elders) — everyone I spoke to was genuinely pleased he was there, and very pleased he's in the job. Which I'm sure isn't common with politicians."
 


Comments

Be the first one to comment...


You must be logged in to leave comments.

Sign in using the form below.

Username
Password
 

No results were found

Newsletter

Poll

As an artist, are you aware of the impact your own practice has on the environment?

Yes, and I consider that when chosing processes and materials.

Yes, but it's better to think of the art first, and the materials and processes second.

No, it's not a consideration when I make my art.


RSS Feeds

Arts

Stills: DSLR Camera Training

Art in the Underbelly: SAMOOBSAUGA

Maureen Paley: Male: a group exhibition selected by Vince Aletti

Vestry House Museum: E17 Art Trail: Welcome to Walthamstow

Hybrid: Close to Home

Five Years: Fairyland

KALEID: 1+1+1

Trade: Ben Woodeson - Violations #10 and #15

Environment

The week in wildlife

Which is the most eco-friendly alcoholic drink?

Get your camera and capture nature's harvest

Road threatens wildebeest migration

What is the 'environmentalist's paradox'?

Country diary: New Forest

UN to hold crisis talks on food prices as riots hit Mozambique

Mr and Mrs Mussel plan largest offshore farm in Europe